Saturday, 21 February 2026

PPP

 Panprotopsychism is a philosophical view about the nature of consciousness.


It is a middle position between:


  • Physicalism (only physical matter exists)
  • Panpsychism (everything has some form of consciousness)






🧠 Core Idea



Panprotopsychism says:


The fundamental building blocks of reality are not conscious,

but they have proto-conscious properties that can give rise to consciousness when arranged in the right way.


So:


  • Electrons are not conscious
  • Atoms are not conscious
  • But the basic stuff of the universe contains properties that can combine to produce conscious experience






🔍 Why Propose It?



It’s mainly motivated by the Hard Problem of Consciousness, introduced by David Chalmers:


How does subjective experience arise from physical matter?


Panprotopsychism tries to avoid two extremes:

View

Problem

Physicalism

Hard to explain how experience arises from purely non-experiential matter

Panpsychism

Seems strange to say electrons are conscious

Panprotopsychism says:


  • Fundamental reality has the potential for experience
  • But only complex systems (like brains) actually become conscious






🧩 Difference from Panpsychism


Panpsychism

Panprotopsychism

Basic entities are conscious

Basic entities are not conscious

Consciousness is everywhere

Only proto-properties are everywhere

Combination problem: how do tiny experiences combine?

Avoids combination of tiny experiences





📚 Related Philosophers



  • David Chalmers (sympathetic to versions of it)
  • Bertrand Russell (inspired Russellian monism, often linked)
  • Galen Strawson (defends panpsychism rather than panprotopsychism)






🧠 In Simple Terms



Think of it like this:


  • Hydrogen and oxygen aren’t wet.
  • But when combined correctly, they produce water — which is wet.



Similarly:


  • Fundamental particles aren’t conscious.
  • But arranged in brains, proto-properties produce experience.





If you’d like, I can also explain:


  • How it connects to quantum mechanics
  • Russellian monism
  • Objections to it
  • Whether it solves the Hard Problem
  • How it compares to idealism



What direction are you interested in?


No comments:

Post a Comment