A
This is a medical textbook table titled:
“Table 24.16 – Comparative Summary of the Parameters of MRI Scoring Systems.”
It compares three different MRI-based scoring systems used to assess brain injury patterns — most commonly in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) (brain injury from lack of oxygen around birth).
The three scoring systems listed are:
1️⃣ Barkovich Score
A. J. Barkovich
Total score: 0–4
Focuses mainly on:
Basal ganglia (BG)
Thalamus (T)
Cortex
Simpler, more categorical system
Grades injury severity based on which brain regions show abnormal MRI signals.
2️⃣ Mathur Score
A. M. Mathur
Total score: up to 134
More detailed and regional
Scores:
Subcortical regions (caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, PLIC)
White matter
Cortex
Brainstem
Cerebellum
Uses multiple MRI sequences (T1, T2, DWI).
3️⃣ Weeke Score
L. C. Weeke
Total score: 57
Most comprehensive of the three
Includes:
Gray matter regions
White matter
Cerebellum
Additional findings (hemorrhage, lactate on MR spectroscopy, venous sinus thrombosis)
What This Table Is Showing
It’s comparing:
✅ Which brain regions each system evaluates
✅ How many items they score
✅ Maximum possible score
✅ Level of detail
So this table is essentially a comparison chart of MRI scoring systems used to quantify neonatal brain injury severity.
If you’d like, I can explain:
What basal ganglia injury means clinically
Which scoring system is most predictive
Or how MRI patterns relate to long-term outcomes
No comments:
Post a Comment