Saturday, 21 February 2026

 

A



This is a medical textbook table titled:

“Table 24.16 – Comparative Summary of the Parameters of MRI Scoring Systems.”

It compares three different MRI-based scoring systems used to assess brain injury patterns — most commonly in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) (brain injury from lack of oxygen around birth).

The three scoring systems listed are:


1️⃣ Barkovich Score

A. J. Barkovich

  • Total score: 0–4

  • Focuses mainly on:

    • Basal ganglia (BG)

    • Thalamus (T)

    • Cortex

  • Simpler, more categorical system

  • Grades injury severity based on which brain regions show abnormal MRI signals.


2️⃣ Mathur Score

A. M. Mathur

  • Total score: up to 134

  • More detailed and regional

  • Scores:

    • Subcortical regions (caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, PLIC)

    • White matter

    • Cortex

    • Brainstem

    • Cerebellum

  • Uses multiple MRI sequences (T1, T2, DWI).


3️⃣ Weeke Score

L. C. Weeke

  • Total score: 57

  • Most comprehensive of the three

  • Includes:

    • Gray matter regions

    • White matter

    • Cerebellum

    • Additional findings (hemorrhage, lactate on MR spectroscopy, venous sinus thrombosis)


What This Table Is Showing

It’s comparing:

  • ✅ Which brain regions each system evaluates

  • ✅ How many items they score

  • ✅ Maximum possible score

  • ✅ Level of detail

So this table is essentially a comparison chart of MRI scoring systems used to quantify neonatal brain injury severity.


If you’d like, I can explain:

  • What basal ganglia injury means clinically

  • Which scoring system is most predictive

  • Or how MRI patterns relate to long-term outcomes

No comments:

Post a Comment