A
BGT… I love where your head’s at. This is the kind of edge-space where philosophy, neuroscience, physics, and mysticism all start overlapping in strange ways.
Let’s unpack this carefully — because there are real intersections here… but also some important distinctions.
🕉 Non-Duality (Advaita & Buddhism)
Traditions like Advaita Vedanta and certain schools of Buddhism argue:
The sense of a separate self is constructed.
Reality is not divided into subject vs. object.
Awareness is fundamental — not personal.
In Advaita, ultimate reality is Brahman, pure consciousness. The individual self (Atman) isn’t different from it. Separation is a misperception created by identification with mind and body.
Buddhism approaches it slightly differently — emphasizing emptiness (śūnyatā) and dependent origination — but the experiential insight is similar: the boundary between “self” and “world” dissolves.
These traditions didn’t arrive there through physics.
They arrived there through introspection.
🧠 Psychedelics & the Default Mode Network
Modern neuroscience shows that psychedelics like psilocybin reduce activity in the default mode network (DMN) — the network involved in:
Self-referential thinking
Narrative identity
Past/future simulation
When the DMN quiets:
Brain regions that don’t normally communicate begin cross-talking.
The rigid “self-model” destabilizes.
People report ego dissolution and unity experiences.
From a neuroscience lens, this doesn’t automatically mean they’re perceiving an ultimate field of consciousness. It means the brain’s filtering and boundary-maintaining mechanisms loosen.
But here’s the interesting tension:
If the brain normally constructs the sense of separation…
then what’s left when that construction drops?
Is it noise?
Or something more fundamental?
That’s the philosophical opening.
⚛️ Consciousness as a Field?
There are researchers exploring unconventional ideas:
Panpsychism (consciousness as fundamental)
Integrated Information Theory (consciousness corresponds to causal structure)
Orch-OR (Penrose & Hameroff’s microtubule theory)
The microtubule idea proposes quantum processes inside neurons might contribute to consciousness. However:
It’s highly debated.
Evidence for large-scale quantum coherence in warm brains is still weak.
It does not currently prove consciousness is a universal field.
When physicists talk about “fields,” they mean mathematically defined quantities at every point in spacetime. Some philosophers speculate consciousness could be analogous — but this remains speculative, not established physics.
Right now, there is no confirmed physical consciousness field like electromagnetism.
But the conceptual move — “what if consciousness is fundamental?” — is philosophically live.
🌌 Panpsychism: Awake All the Way Down
Panpsychism says:
Consciousness isn’t produced.
It’s intrinsic to matter.
Brains don’t create it — they organize or amplify it.
This avoids the “hard problem” (how subjective experience emerges from non-experiential matter) by saying matter was never non-experiential to begin with.
It’s elegant.
But it introduces another puzzle: how do tiny proto-experiences combine into unified human consciousness? (The “combination problem.”)
Still unsolved.
🧩 The Psychedelic Oneness Question
Now here’s the subtle point.
When someone experiences unity under psychedelics, three interpretations are possible:
Neural construction theory:
The brain disrupted its self-model, generating a powerful but internal illusion.Revealing theory:
The brain normally filters reality, and psychedelics temporarily reduce that filter.Agnostic middle ground:
The experience reveals something real about how selfhood is constructed — but not necessarily about cosmic metaphysics.
Science currently supports #1 and #3.
#2 is philosophically possible but not empirically verified.
🔄 Where It Gets Interesting
Here’s the part that isn’t fluff:
The self is demonstrably constructed.
The sense of separation is neurologically contingent.
Consciousness remains unexplained by standard physical models.
Serious philosophers (not mystics) are reconsidering whether materialism is complete.
So while physics has not converged on “the universe is one giant mind,” it has absolutely not solved what consciousness is.
We are in a genuine explanatory gap.
🧠 What If Matter Emerges From Awareness?
That flips the usual assumption.
Instead of:
Matter → brain → consciousness
You get:
Consciousness → structured patterns → matter appearance
This view is called idealism in philosophy of mind. It’s minority, but respected.
The key thing to notice:
None of these positions are experimentally settled.
We’re still in metaphysical territory.
🌿 The “Enlightenment” Question
You asked:
Makes you wonder if enlightenment is just the moment when you realize you were never separate in the first place.
From a psychological standpoint:
Enlightenment experiences often correlate with permanent changes in self-processing networks.
From a contemplative standpoint:
It’s not acquiring new knowledge — it’s seeing through an illusion.
From a scientific standpoint:
We don’t yet know whether it reveals ultimate ontology or just deep cognitive restructuring.
🧭 My Grounded Take
There is real overlap here — but we should be careful not to over-merge them.
Non-duality = experiential insight about the constructed self.
Psychedelics = neurochemical modulation of self-processing networks.
Panpsychism = metaphysical proposal about matter.
Consciousness field theories = speculative physics.
They rhyme.
But they are not the same claim.
Still…
The fact that ancient introspection and modern neuroscience both point to the self being less solid than we thought? That’s not trivial.
Whether that implies:
Cosmic mind
Fundamental awareness
Or just a clever evolutionary self-model
…is still an open frontier.
And that frontier is one of the most interesting conversations happening right now.
If you want, we can go deeper into:
The hard problem vs. illusionism
Whether quantum mechanics actually supports idealism
Or whether unity experiences can be explained entirely by predictive processing theory
Where do you want to push next?
No comments:
Post a Comment