A
Here’s a bullet-point gist of the idea “Consciousness Began When the Gods Stopped Speaking” (often associated with Julian Jaynes’ bicameral mind theory):
-
Humans were once not conscious in the modern sense; instead, they experienced thoughts as auditory hallucinations—the “voices of gods.”
-
Early humans operated via a bicameral mind: one brain hemisphere issued commands (experienced as gods), the other obeyed.
-
Decision-making was guided by these hallucinatory voices rather than introspection or self-awareness.
-
As societies grew more complex and crises increased (war, migration, societal collapse), this system broke down.
-
The “voices of gods” gradually fell silent, pushing humans to develop introspection, self-narration, and subjective consciousness to cope.
-
Language, metaphor, and cultural changes supported the transition from bicameral mentality to modern conscious thought.
-
Myths, oracles, and ancient texts preserve traces of the older bicameral mode, where divine commands guided behavior.
-
Consciousness, in this theory, is a learned cultural and psychological construction, not a biological inevitability.
Julian Jaynes’ bicameral mind theory (from his 1976 book The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind) is one of the most unusual and influential theories about how human consciousness arose.
Here’s a clear explanation:
What Jaynes Believed
1. Ancient humans were not conscious like we are today
Jaynes argued that humans before about 3,000 years ago lacked introspective consciousness—no inner monologue, no awareness of their own thoughts as “theirs.”
2. They had a “bicameral mind”
-
The brain was functionally split into two “chambers.”
-
The right hemisphere generated commands or guidance.
-
The left hemisphere received these commands.
-
People experienced these commands as auditory hallucinations—heard as the voices of gods, ancestors, or chiefs.
3. Hallucinated voices guided behavior
Instead of deliberating or reflecting internally, early humans acted when they “heard” instructions.
These voices:
-
Gave orders during stress or uncertainty
-
Provided social structure and authority
-
Were interpreted as divine voices, not internal thoughts
Mythological accounts of gods directing people were, in Jaynes’ interpretation, literal experiences, not metaphors.
Why the Bicameral Mind Broke Down
Jaynes claimed that around 1200–1000 BCE (Bronze Age collapse era):
-
Massive societal disruption
-
Migration, war, famine
-
Growth of cities
-
Need for more complex decision-making
…made the old hallucination-based guidance system unreliable.
People ceased hearing the “voices” as often.
To survive, humans developed:
-
Introspection
-
Self-narration (telling yourself a story about your own mind)
-
Metaphorical thinking
-
Deliberate reasoning
This was the birth of modern subjective consciousness.
Evidence Jaynes Used
He pointed to:
-
Ancient texts (like the Iliad) where characters don’t show introspection; gods intervene constantly.
-
Sudden later appearance of self-reflective language (e.g., in later Greek literature like the Odyssey).
-
Archeology showing widespread civilizational collapse around the time consciousness supposedly emerged.
-
Neuroscience observations about how auditory hallucinations can be triggered and how they resemble schizophrenia.
How Consciousness Works in Jaynes’ View
Consciousness is not:
-
Universal in all animals
-
A biological given
-
The same as perception or problem-solving
Consciousness is a learned, culturally-influenced mental tool based on:
-
Language
-
Metaphor
-
Self-modeling
-
Internal narration
-
Social context
It’s like having an internal “theater of the mind” that people had to invent.
How the Theory Is Viewed Today
Jaynes’ theory is:
-
Highly controversial
-
Not widely accepted in neuroscience
-
But influential in psychology, cognitive science, philosophy, anthropology, and literature
Many believe:
-
Jaynes was wrong literally but insightful metaphorically
-
He may have correctly predicted roles of narration, language, trauma, and hallucination in shaping the sense of self
If you want, I can also provide:
-
A short 5-sentence summary
-
A critique of the theory
-
A comparison with modern neuroscience
-
Or a diagram-style breakdown of the bicameral mind system
No comments:
Post a Comment