A
Here’s a bullet-gist summary of the video NutritionFacts.org — “The Best Way to Test for Vitamin B12 Deficiency” by Michael Greger M.D.:
-
Many diagnoses of vitamin B12 deficiency are made (or dismissed) based solely on a single serum B12 blood test—which is problematic. (NutritionFacts.org)
-
Key issues with the standard serum B12 test:
-
Large variability between labs (same blood sample can show very different results). (NutritionFacts.org)
-
Significant day-to-day variation in an individual’s B12 levels (e.g., variation of >100 points over 10 weeks). (NutritionFacts.org)
-
A person may have normal or even high serum B12, yet still have functional deficiency (symptoms or neurologic damage) because serum B12 alone isn’t always reliable. (NutritionFacts.org)
-
-
Better assessment uses functional biomarkers of B12 status:
-
Methylmalonic acid (MMA)
-
Homocysteine
These rise when B12 is insufficient even if serum B12 is “normal.” (NutritionFacts.org)
-
-
However: functional tests also have limitations (e.g., kidney function can raise MMA, folate deficiency can raise homocysteine). (NutritionFacts.org)
-
For patients with classic symptoms of B12 deficiency (e.g., neuropathy, numbness, “pins & needles”), Dr Greger suggests: if tests are inconclusive → consider a therapeutic trial of B12 supplementation, because waiting for perfect tests may miss the deficiency. (NutritionFacts.org)
-
Bottom line: there is no perfect biomarker or testing algorithm for B12 deficiency; clinical judgment matters. (NutritionFacts.org)
-
From a public-health perspective: ensuring adequate intake of B12 (via diet, fortification or supplementation) is easier than relying solely on testing. (NutritionFacts.org)
If you like, I can pull out “top 5 practical take-aways” from the video for patients or clinicians.
No comments:
Post a Comment