Here’s a bullet-point gist with short, quote-style notes based on the themes you highlighted about Diana Pasulka (American Cosmic) and Dr. Garry Nolan’s insights:
- “Crash sites yield more than debris — they hint at technologies beyond our physics.”
(New Mexico materials, anomalous isotopic ratios, unusual structures) - “Religion has always had protocols for contact — prayer, ritual, silence — ways of tuning consciousness.”
(Vatican archives, saints, mystics, sacred technologies of attention) - “Altered states are not noise — they’re signal.”
(Links between mystical visions, creativity, genius, and contact phenomena) - “If you limit truth to materialism, you’ll miss half the data.”
(Consciousness as an active participant, not just a byproduct) - “Non-human intelligence may not knock on our door — it may knock on our mind.”
(Interface through consciousness rather than only hardware) - “The boundary between science and religion may be artificial — both describe encounters with the Other.”
⚡In essence: crash materials give hints, but consciousness may be the real “technology” of contact.
Would you like me to weave this into a one-page synthesis that combines Pascal’s Wager, saints/avatars, and these UAP-consciousness insights — showing how they all point toward belief as the pragmatic path?
No comments:
Post a Comment