Wednesday, 20 August 2025

Sc non dualism

Great — let’s do a deep dive into the scientific arguments for non-dualism, focusing on how different fields (physics, neuroscience, and philosophy of mind) converge on the rejection of dualism and support some form of non-dual understanding of reality.





🔬 Scientific Arguments for Non-Dualism




1. 

Neuroscience & Cognitive Science



Non-dualism here means no fundamental split between mind and body, subject and object.


  • Francisco Varela & Evan Thompson (Embodied Cognition / Enactivism)
    • Argue that consciousness isn’t “inside the head” but arises through the interaction between brain, body, and environment.
    • No strict divide between subject and object; cognition is participatory and relational.
    • Parallels with Buddhist non-duality (emptiness, dependent origination).
  • Antonio Damasio (Embodied Mind)
    • Shows how emotions and bodily states are foundational to consciousness.
    • Rejects Cartesian dualism by grounding mind in physiology.
  • Thomas Metzinger (No-Self Model)
    • Argues the “self” is a useful model generated by the brain, not an independent entity.
    • Strong resonance with non-dual philosophies that deny a permanent, separate self.
  • Anil Seth (Predictive Processing & Perception)
    • Consciousness is a “controlled hallucination” — not a window onto an independent world.
    • What we call “reality” is co-constructed by brain and environment, blurring subject-object boundaries.



Key Argument: Consciousness and world are not two separate substances but co-arising processes → a non-dual mind–world continuum.





2. 

Physics & Cosmology



Non-dualism here means no absolute divide between observer and observed, matter and mind.


  • David Bohm (Implicate Order)
    • Proposed that reality has a deeper, undivided order from which both mind and matter unfold.
    • Rejected fragmentation — everything is enfolded in everything else.
  • Quantum Mechanics (Copenhagen, Relational, Participatory Interpretations)
    • Measurement problem: observer and observed cannot be cleanly separated.
    • Wheeler’s participatory universe: observers help bring reality into being.
    • Carlo Rovelli (Relational Quantum Mechanics): quantum states exist only in relation to observers, not absolutely.
  • Erwin Schrödinger (Vedantic Influence)
    • Consciousness is a singular, unified field; multiplicity of selves is an illusion.
    • Strongly tied physics to Advaita Vedanta non-duality.



Key Argument: Physics reveals inseparability of observer and observed, pushing toward a non-dual ontology where subject-object distinction is secondary.





3. 

Philosophy of Mind



Non-dualism here means rejecting both materialist reductionism and Cartesian dualism.


  • Neutral Monism (William James, Bertrand Russell, Galen Strawson)
    • Reality is neither fundamentally “mental” nor “physical” but neutral stuff appearing as both.
    • Removes the dualism between inner (mental) and outer (physical).
  • Panpsychism & Integrated Information Theory (Tononi, Koch, Strawson)
    • Consciousness is a fundamental, integrated aspect of reality.
    • No sharp divide between mind and matter — both are aspects of the same continuum.
  • Process Philosophy (Alfred North Whitehead)
    • Reality is a process of interrelated events, not separate substances.
    • Echoes non-dual traditions in emphasizing interdependence.



Key Argument: Mind and matter are not two fundamentally different substances but different expressions of one underlying reality.





4. 

Science–Spirituality Bridge Thinkers



(Not strictly “scientists,” but they integrate science with non-dual philosophy.)


  • Fritjof Capra (The Tao of Physics) – Parallels between quantum physics and Eastern non-dual traditions.
  • Alan Wallace – Bridges Tibetan Buddhism with cognitive science.
  • Rupert Spira – Non-dual philosopher drawing from phenomenology and neuroscience.






🌍 Unifying Takeaway



Across fields, scientific non-dualism rejects the idea of two fundamentally separate realms (mind vs. matter, observer vs. observed). Instead, it points toward:


  • Embodied mind (no split between brain and world)
  • Relational physics (no split between observer and reality)
  • Non-dual metaphysics (mind and matter as aspects of one process)





👉 Would you like me to map this into a structured chart (showing fields, key advocates, and their arguments), so you can see how neuroscience, physics, and philosophy converge on non-dualism?


No comments:

Post a Comment