Great — let’s do a deep dive into the scientific arguments for non-dualism, focusing on how different fields (physics, neuroscience, and philosophy of mind) converge on the rejection of dualism and support some form of non-dual understanding of reality.
🔬 Scientific Arguments for Non-Dualism
1.
Neuroscience & Cognitive Science
Non-dualism here means no fundamental split between mind and body, subject and object.
- Francisco Varela & Evan Thompson (Embodied Cognition / Enactivism)
- Argue that consciousness isn’t “inside the head” but arises through the interaction between brain, body, and environment.
- No strict divide between subject and object; cognition is participatory and relational.
- Parallels with Buddhist non-duality (emptiness, dependent origination).
- Antonio Damasio (Embodied Mind)
- Shows how emotions and bodily states are foundational to consciousness.
- Rejects Cartesian dualism by grounding mind in physiology.
- Thomas Metzinger (No-Self Model)
- Argues the “self” is a useful model generated by the brain, not an independent entity.
- Strong resonance with non-dual philosophies that deny a permanent, separate self.
- Anil Seth (Predictive Processing & Perception)
- Consciousness is a “controlled hallucination” — not a window onto an independent world.
- What we call “reality” is co-constructed by brain and environment, blurring subject-object boundaries.
Key Argument: Consciousness and world are not two separate substances but co-arising processes → a non-dual mind–world continuum.
2.
Physics & Cosmology
Non-dualism here means no absolute divide between observer and observed, matter and mind.
- David Bohm (Implicate Order)
- Proposed that reality has a deeper, undivided order from which both mind and matter unfold.
- Rejected fragmentation — everything is enfolded in everything else.
- Quantum Mechanics (Copenhagen, Relational, Participatory Interpretations)
- Measurement problem: observer and observed cannot be cleanly separated.
- Wheeler’s participatory universe: observers help bring reality into being.
- Carlo Rovelli (Relational Quantum Mechanics): quantum states exist only in relation to observers, not absolutely.
- Erwin Schrödinger (Vedantic Influence)
- Consciousness is a singular, unified field; multiplicity of selves is an illusion.
- Strongly tied physics to Advaita Vedanta non-duality.
Key Argument: Physics reveals inseparability of observer and observed, pushing toward a non-dual ontology where subject-object distinction is secondary.
3.
Philosophy of Mind
Non-dualism here means rejecting both materialist reductionism and Cartesian dualism.
- Neutral Monism (William James, Bertrand Russell, Galen Strawson)
- Reality is neither fundamentally “mental” nor “physical” but neutral stuff appearing as both.
- Removes the dualism between inner (mental) and outer (physical).
- Panpsychism & Integrated Information Theory (Tononi, Koch, Strawson)
- Consciousness is a fundamental, integrated aspect of reality.
- No sharp divide between mind and matter — both are aspects of the same continuum.
- Process Philosophy (Alfred North Whitehead)
- Reality is a process of interrelated events, not separate substances.
- Echoes non-dual traditions in emphasizing interdependence.
Key Argument: Mind and matter are not two fundamentally different substances but different expressions of one underlying reality.
4.
Science–Spirituality Bridge Thinkers
(Not strictly “scientists,” but they integrate science with non-dual philosophy.)
- Fritjof Capra (The Tao of Physics) – Parallels between quantum physics and Eastern non-dual traditions.
- Alan Wallace – Bridges Tibetan Buddhism with cognitive science.
- Rupert Spira – Non-dual philosopher drawing from phenomenology and neuroscience.
🌍 Unifying Takeaway
Across fields, scientific non-dualism rejects the idea of two fundamentally separate realms (mind vs. matter, observer vs. observed). Instead, it points toward:
- Embodied mind (no split between brain and world)
- Relational physics (no split between observer and reality)
- Non-dual metaphysics (mind and matter as aspects of one process)
👉 Would you like me to map this into a structured chart (showing fields, key advocates, and their arguments), so you can see how neuroscience, physics, and philosophy converge on non-dualism?
No comments:
Post a Comment