B
Summary of "A New 'Self-Model': Rapid Alternation of 'Awareness' and 'Awareness of Awareness'"
Section | Key Points |
---|---|
1. Introduction | - The debate on self spans philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science. |
- Western perspectives: Descartes' "Cogito, ergo sum" vs. Hume’s "Bundle Theory." | |
- Eastern perspectives: Buddhist "non-self" (anatta) vs. Advaita Vedanta’s Atman. | |
- Modern cognitive science sees the self as a constructed process rather than a fixed entity. | |
- The paper proposes a new "Self-Model" where the self is an illusion from alternating "awareness" and "awareness of awareness." | |
2. The Nature of Vipassana | - Vipassana: Enhanced awareness induced by meditation. |
- Henri Bergson's theory: Meditation weakens perception filters, allowing detailed awareness. | |
- In Vipassana, the five aggregates can be observed like a slow-motion film. | |
3. Awareness of Awareness | - Each of the five aggregates represents a state of awareness (Payutto, 2019). |
- Awareness of awareness: Knowing that you feel happy differs from just feeling happy. | |
- Meditation enhances both awareness and meta-awareness, revealing the impermanence of experiences. | |
4. Five Aggregates as Awareness | - Traditional view: Five aggregates (form, feeling, perception, mental formations, consciousness) define a person. |
- New argument: Aggregates describe subjective experience (Bhikkhu, Gethin, Hamilton, Wynne). | |
- Aggregates function as moments of awareness rather than fixed entities. | |
- Example: Smelling an odor triggers a chain reaction of awareness and responses. | |
5. Ajahn Brahm’s "Fruit Salad Simile" | - Ajahn Brahm's analogy: Consciousness is discrete mental events, not a continuous stream. |
- Simile: Like fruits appearing and disappearing on a plate, types of consciousness arise sequentially. | |
- This undermines the belief in a constant, observing self and aligns with the Buddhist principle of non-self. | |
6. A New "Self-Model" | - Inspired by Brahm’s insight, the model proposes "awareness of awareness" after each aggregate. |
- The self is an illusion formed by the rapid alternation between awareness and meta-awareness. | |
- Analogy: Similar to a spinning torch creating the illusion of a continuous ring of fire. | |
- Supports the Buddhist doctrine of non-self and challenges Western concepts of a fixed mental entity. |
A
Summary of "A New Self-Model: Rapid Alternation of 'Awareness' and 'Awareness of Awareness'"
Aspect | Details |
---|---|
Core Concept | The self is an illusion arising from the rapid alternation between "awareness" and "awareness of awareness." |
Comparison to Metzinger | Contrasts with Metzinger’s Self-Model Theory by emphasizing the alternating nature of awareness rather than a static model. |
Vipassana Insight | - Vipassana meditation enhances awareness, enabling observation of the five aggregates (form, feeling, perception, mental formations, consciousness) like slow-motion film. |
Five Aggregates View | - Traditional: Person consists of ever-changing aggregates. - New Model: Aggregates represent a subjective stream of consciousness (Thanissaro Bhikkhu, Gethin, Hamilton, Wynne). |
Awareness of Awareness | - Each aggregate corresponds to awareness. - Contemplation reveals a secondary awareness that observes the first (Payutto). - Example: Feeling happy ≠ Knowing you feel happy. |
Ajahn Brahm's Contribution | - Inspired by Brahm’s “fruit salad simile”, the model proposes that awareness of awareness arises after each aggregate, not simultaneously. |
Key Mechanism | - Illusion of a constant self emerges because of the rapid alternation between awareness and awareness of awareness (like a spinning torch appearing as a ring). |
Buddhist Principle | Supports the Buddhist concept of “non-self”—there is no permanent mental entity or continuous self. |
Philosophical Implication | Challenges Western philosophical notions of a constant mental entity, proposing that mental events do not occur simultaneously. |
No comments:
Post a Comment