Several features typical of the Indian accounts can be seen in the
following, given by a woman suffering from a fever for which she received
no medical treatment. She recounted, “I was dragged ‘up’ by four
yamadoots. I saw one door, and went inside. I saw my mother and father
there. I also saw the Yama who was fat and had books in front of him. The
Yama started beating the yamadoots for having taken me there instead of
another person… . I was asked by my parents and the Yama to be sent back
… and I was happy to be back so I could see my children.”4
As in the account given above, the Indian subjects frequently report
being taken to the “other realms” by some messengers, where a man with a
book consults some records, decides a mistake has been made—that the
subject’s time has not yet come—and orders the subject’s return. This
contrasts especially with Western cases, in which the subjects are usually
not escorted by messengers and no mistake accounts for their return. None
of the Indian subjects reported a panoramic life review. Although Osis and
Haraldsson found several OBEs in their reports, Pasricha and Stevenson
found only one case out of twenty-eight that contained this feature. Also,
descriptions of tunnels are conspicuous by their absence from the reports of
Indian subjects; not a single informant in these studies reported the
experience of a tunnel.
Nevertheless, we can also see that there are some striking similarities
between Indian and Western accounts. In both cultures, experiencers
frequently report meeting deceased acquaintances and otherworldly beings,
usually in an unearthly realm. In both sets of reports, a decision is
frequently made that it is not one’s “time to go.” Although the Indian
reports lack a panoramic life review, the reading of Chitragupta’s book can
be considered a form of life review, although one that is thought to be
postponed until the actual day of reckoning.
No comments:
Post a Comment