CJ. BG 11.52

 Yes — there’s a loose psychological correlation, not a theological one:

• Carl Jung argued that direct encounters with the divine are rare experiences where the conscious ego meets an archetype of the Self. This parallels Bhagavad Gita describing Arjuna uniquely perceiving Krishna — a special psychological “vision” not available through effort alone.
• Jung emphasized grace-like spontaneity: the unconscious reveals itself unexpectedly, not by intellectual study. This mirrors the Gita’s claim that Vedic study, austerity, and rituals cannot force the vision — it comes through devotion (psychologically: receptivity).
• Jung also noted that symbols of gods are more relatable in human form. The Gita’s shift from cosmic form back to Krishna’s personal form matches Jung’s idea that the psyche integrates the divine best when it appears in a personal, human-scale image rather than overwhelming totality.