A
Here is a clean comparison table:
| Feature | Nirvikalpa Samādhi | Sahaja Samādhi |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | “Absorption without mental modifications” | “Natural, effortless samādhi” |
| Nature | A meditative trance/state | Natural, continuous condition |
| Thought activity | Completely absent | Thoughts may appear, but no identification |
| Awareness of world | Absent during absorption | World is perceived but without ego |
| Ego | Temporarily suspended | Permanently destroyed |
| Duration | Temporary | Continuous / stable |
| Entry/exit | One enters and returns | No entering or exiting |
| Effort | Requires meditation practice | Effortless after realization |
| Dependency | Depends on practice and withdrawal | Independent of practice; natural being |
| Risk | Can revert to ordinary mind | No reversal once established |
| Core limitation | Does not guarantee liberation | Considered full liberation in Ramana’s teaching |
| Analogy | Deep stillness like a frozen lake | Open sky—unchanged in all conditions |
If you want, I can add a third column comparing Bhagavad Gītā samādhi / jñāna yoga perspective to both.
No comments:
Post a Comment