A
Here is a concise summary of key insights from Robert Sapolsky’s 2023 book, Determined: A Science of Life Without Free Will:(Wikipedia)
🧠 Core Concepts
-
Free Will as Illusion: Sapolsky argues that free will is a myth; our actions are the result of complex biological and environmental factors beyond conscious control.(The New Yorker)
-
Neurobiological Determinism: Decisions are initiated by brain processes before conscious awareness, indicating that intentions are products of prior causes.
-
Chain of Causality: Human behavior is shaped by genetics, prenatal conditions, upbringing, and life experiences, leaving no room for autonomous choice.
⚖️ Implications for Justice and Morality
-
Rethinking Responsibility: If actions are predetermined, concepts of moral responsibility, praise, and blame require reevaluation.
-
Justice System Reform: Sapolsky suggests moving away from retributive justice towards systems focused on rehabilitation and prevention.
-
Compassion Over Judgment: Understanding the deterministic nature of behavior can foster empathy and reduce punitive attitudes.
🔬 Scientific Foundations
-
Interdisciplinary Evidence: The book draws from neuroscience, psychology, genetics, and evolutionary biology to support its claims.
-
Emergent Complexity: Even complex behaviors emerge from simpler deterministic processes, challenging notions of spontaneous free will.
-
Randomness ≠ Freedom: Random events or quantum indeterminacy do not equate to free will, as they are still outside conscious control.
🌍 Societal and Cultural Reflections
-
Influence of Technology: Modern algorithms and AI can predict and influence human behavior, underscoring our susceptibility to external determinants.(Latest news & breaking headlines)
-
Cultural Narratives: Societal beliefs in individualism and self-determination may conflict with scientific understandings of determinism.
-
Policy Considerations: Acknowledging determinism could inform policies that address systemic factors influencing behavior, such as education and socioeconomic conditions.
📚 Reception and Critique
-
Engaging Presentation: Critics praise the book's accessible writing and comprehensive research.(Wikipedia)
-
Philosophical Debate: Some philosophers argue that Sapolsky's scientific approach overlooks important philosophical discussions on free will and moral responsibility.(Wikipedia)
-
Practical Challenges: While the deterministic view is compelling, its application in daily life and societal structures presents challenges that require careful consideration.
Sapolsky's Determined invites readers to reconsider deeply held beliefs about autonomy and responsibility, suggesting that embracing a deterministic perspective can lead to a more compassionate and just society.
A
Here are some impactful quotes from Robert M. Sapolsky's Determined: A Science of Life Without Free Will, which challenge traditional notions of autonomy and moral responsibility:(The New Yorker)
🔍 Key Quotes from Determined
-
“We are nothing more or less than the cumulative biological and environmental luck, over which we had no control, that has brought us to any moment.” (Goodreads)
-
“In order to prove there’s free will, you have to show that some behavior just happened out of thin air... you can’t with anything known to science.” (Goodreads)
-
“What the science in this book ultimately teaches is that there is no meaning. There’s no answer to ‘Why?’ beyond ‘This happened because of what came just before...’” (Goodreads)
-
“You cannot decide all the sensory stimuli in your environment, your hormone levels this morning, whether something traumatic happened to you in the past...” (Goodreads)
-
“It’s impossible to successfully will yourself to have more willpower. And that it isn’t a great idea to run the world on the belief that people can and should.” (Goodreads)
🧠 Core Insights
-
Free will is an illusion: Our decisions are shaped by genetics, environment, and neurobiology, not by conscious choice.
-
Moral responsibility is redefined: Understanding the absence of free will challenges traditional concepts of blame and praise.
-
Determinism's implications: Recognizing determinism can lead to more compassionate and less punitive societal structures.
For a deeper exploration of these themes, you might find this discussion insightful:
Life Without Free Will || Robert Sapolsky
A
Determinism became obvious to me when I was 14 too. Everything Sapolsky says is so obvious and redundent to me. An easy test to reveal the pervasive nature of determinism in anyone's life is for a week write down every instance of free will you experience. Then watch this video again and see if that behavior stands the test of free will - Was there nothing that influenced or came before it? This goes all the way down to the flavor of ice cream or the flowers I choose. I see what preceeded everything on a day to day basis. And I feel liberated by determinism and am able to improve my life based on the learnings of determinism. Don't put yourself down. Take advantage of your strengths. Look at yourself without self-deception. Life keeps getting better.
A
That's basically what they've known in the East for several thousand years. Most (if not all) east spiritual practices based primarily on noticing this cause-and-effect determinism and patiently trying to extricate yourself from this web. Like a photon that does not feel time, you will free yourself from determinism (karma) when you experience enlightenment. One of the liberating practices is the "middle way" approach, where one does not sit in either extreme exclusively, but in both at the same time, experiencing the paradox. And so in this sense, we have no free will (just listen to Sapkowski) and we have free will at the same time (just quiet down for a moment, focus on the present and there is not the slightest doubt that "free will" exists as such). Thinking that there is absolutely no free will, or that there is only free will and sometimes something will guide us, is dualistic thinking, only feeding neurosis. Try being in the paradox that there is no free will and that free will is, both at the same time. A funny thing will happen then.
A
I do not accept his conclusion that there is no place for reward and punishment. It's not because I believe that the recipient deserves reward or punishment, but rather that reward and punishment provides an important feedback loop. If I see that one behavior is rewarded and another behavior is punished, that contributes to the person I am and influences the behavior I choose. As a result, I'm more likely to choose the behavior that will be rewarded. In fact, at one point in his talk, Sapolsky makes the obervation that if someone is well behaved, they are rewarded. That makes the person more likely to be well behaved so they can receive the reward.
A
WHAT ABT CHANCE MUTATION
agree that determinism will “determine” your starting point and that likely has an outsized effect on life, but that pure chance/randomness is understated. At a cellular level, decisions need to be made with information that is incomplete or misrepresented (e.g. confounding undetectable forces) and these circumstances generate unique/indeterminite futures. Even as a thought experiment where you had a perfect computer that could quantify all possible inputs, there are events that are purely equivalent probabilitistically and each occurance stacking to create a potentially infinite number of futures. I suppose you could claim that the evolutionary past of an organism will still precondition a decision one way, but I think it’s probably brittle to claim that nowhere along the way there were/are arbitrary decisions (e.g. some such circumstance that creates indecision). Advancing this perspective, we often have to make decisions that appear similar in that the corresponding futures are unknown to us where these choices are purely guesses (because we are not perfect computers), but nonetheless “ours”. To this point, if Sapolsky interprets these junctions as part of Determinism then I can’t disagree, but I believe it dismisses the agency of a random choice; the past cannot infallibly provide us with sensible guidance to novel situations. I believe that this unknowing is at the core of free will. I’m not sure if this is what Sapolsky alluded to as chaos, but it seems dismissive nonetheless because life is chaotic.
A
No comments:
Post a Comment