MORPHIC RESONANCE
RATS LEARNING MAZE 1920- HARVARD THEN OZ, ELSEWHERE
A
HILL EFFECT
INDEPENDENT SCIENTISTS
DARWIN FARADAY LOVELOCK
A
the adaptation via morphic resonance from past cells under attack.
Hill’s proposal involves a transmission of adaptive information
across space, from sister cells under attack to sister cells in the
normal culture. Morphic resonance involves a transmission of
adaptive information across time, from past cells under attack to
present cells under attack, as shown by the dotted lines
A
BHVRIST > COGNITIVE NEUROSC > CONSC STUDIES
A
DAWKINS PINKER DENNETT MATLIST
A
MOL BIO HAS HARD CORE MATLISTS
A
WILLIAM TEMPLE- When I pray, coincidences happen, and when I don't, they don't."
A
SN KNIGHTS TEMPLAR DOCU
A
LAMARCKIAN HERESY IS BACK AS EPIGENETICS
A
MORPHIC RESONANCE X PANPSYCHISM
A
A
"Is matter unconscious?";
"Is nature purposeless?"
"Are minds confined to brains?
A
MYSTICAL UNITY
A
LON OR HABITS OF NATR
"What we have in common," Sheldrake says, "is that we are both certain that evolution is the central feature of nature. But I would say his theory of evolution stops at biology. When it comes to cosmology, for example, he has little to say. I would take the evolutionary principle there, too. I think that the 'laws of nature' are also prone to evolve; I think they are more like habits than laws. Much of what we are beginning to understand is that they clearly have evolved differently in different parts of the universe."
A
WE ARE DETERMINISTIC THINKERS LIVING IN A PROBABILISTIC UNIVERSE
A
INTUITIVE IMAGINATIVE LEAPS
A
83% of the universe is now thought to be "dark matter" and subject to "dark energy" forces that "nothing in our science can begin to explain"
A
STATISTICAL NOT ALWAYS HARDCORE DETERMINISM
A
WEATHER FORECAST IS PROBABILISTIC
A
2 ideas of Sheldrake- Mind is not just Brain x Telephone telepathy x extended mind over space and time
Morphic Resonance x Collective Unconsc of Jung x Habits of Nature
a
There’s pretty much always been a tacit
assumption that our emotions
cause all our problems, and that our reason
must swoop in to clean up the
mess. This line of thinking goes all the
way back to Socrates, who declared
reason the root of all virtue.9 At the
beginning of the Enlightenment,
Descartes argued that our reason was
separate from our animalistic desires
and that it had to learn to control those
desires.10 Kant sort of said the same
thing.11 Freud, too, except there were a
lot of penises involved.
A
No comments:
Post a Comment