Ironically, Watts (1973b) apparently invited and contributed to the above
ad hominem arguments. Regarding his lifestyle, he described himself as a “disreputable epicurean” (p. x) and “an unrepentant sensualist” (p. 54) with robust
appetites for sexuality and liquor.
4
Concerning his mystical experiences, there is
speculation that his discussion of fraudulent mystics acting as master teachers—
the so-called “trickster guru” (Watts, 1977b)—is a self-reference.
5
ad hominem arguments. Regarding his lifestyle, he described himself as a “disreputable epicurean” (p. x) and “an unrepentant sensualist” (p. 54) with robust
appetites for sexuality and liquor.
4
Concerning his mystical experiences, there is
speculation that his discussion of fraudulent mystics acting as master teachers—
the so-called “trickster guru” (Watts, 1977b)—is a self-reference.
5
No comments:
Post a Comment