Sunday, 8 March 2026

Antinatalism

 The darker philosophical argument about pleasure vs pain mainly comes from philosophical pessimism, especially from thinkers like Arthur Schopenhauer and later David Benatar. Their view is almost the opposite of modern psychology.



1. Schopenhauer’s argument: suffering dominates life



In works like The World as Will and Representation, Schopenhauer argued that:


  • Life is driven by endless desire.
  • Desire causes suffering while unfulfilled.
  • When fulfilled, the result is only brief relief, not lasting happiness.



His basic formula:


Pain = the default state

Pleasure = temporary absence of pain


Example:


  • Hunger → suffering
  • Eating → relief (not lasting joy)
  • Soon hunger returns



So he concluded life is mostly cycles of discomfort interrupted by short reliefs.



2. The “pleasure is negative” idea



Schopenhauer said:


  • Pain is positive and real.
  • Pleasure is negative, meaning it just removes pain.



For example:

Situation

Interpretation

Thirst

real suffering

Drinking water

removing suffering

After drinking

neutral again

So pleasure isn’t equal to pain—it’s just temporary cancellation of it.



3. Modern pessimism: Benatar’s asymmetry argument



Philosopher David Benatar expanded this in Better Never to Have Been.


His asymmetry argument says:

Situation

Good or bad

Presence of pain

Bad

Presence of pleasure

Good

Absence of pain

Good

Absence of pleasure

Not bad

This leads him to conclude:


Not existing avoids suffering without depriving anyone of pleasure.


So he argues coming into existence is always a harm.


This view is called Antinatalism.



4. Why many psychologists disagree



Researchers in Positive Psychology argue pessimists ignore several things:


  1. Positive experiences are common and meaningful
  2. Humans experience joy not just relief
  3. People overwhelmingly report their lives are worth living



Large surveys by Gallup and the World Happiness Report consistently show most people rate their lives above the midpoint of satisfaction.



5. The real debate



So the disagreement is basically:

View

Claim

Psychology

Life contains more positive than negative experience

Pessimist philosophy

Suffering dominates because pleasure is only relief

Evolutionary view

Life feels mixed because survival requires sensitivity to pain




✅ The interesting conclusion:

Whether life is mostly pleasure or mostly pain depends on how you define pleasure.


  • If pleasure = positive joy, life tends to be net positive.
  • If pleasure = just relief from suffering, life looks mostly painful.





If you want, I can also show you a really striking statistic about human life that changes how people think about this question: the actual number of hours in an average life spent in enjoyment vs boredom vs stress. It’s surprisingly different from what most people guess.


No comments:

Post a Comment