A
A
A
A
A
A
Ah, now we’re diving into precision medicine language, often used in fields like asthma, COPD, and other complex diseases. Let’s carefully unpack the difference:
Phenotype
Definition: Observable characteristics or traits of a disease.
What it describes: What the disease looks like in a patient.
Examples:
Asthma with frequent exacerbations
COPD with chronic bronchitis vs emphysema
Obese patients with diabetes
Key point: Phenotype is clinical and descriptive, based on signs, symptoms, lab values, imaging, or behavior.
Endotype
Definition: A subtype of a disease defined by its underlying mechanism or biology.
What it describes: Why the disease behaves that way — the pathophysiology.
Examples in asthma:
T2-high asthma: Driven by Th2 inflammation, eosinophils, IL-4/IL-5/IL-13 cytokines
Non-T2 asthma: Neutrophilic or mixed inflammation, different molecular drivers
Key point: Endotype explains the mechanistic cause, not just the outward appearance.
Simple Analogy
Phenotype = the “face of the disease” (what you see).
Endotype = the “engine under the hood” (what’s driving it).
If you want, I can make a tiny visual chart showing phenotype vs endotype with examples in asthma—it makes it super intuitive. Do you want me to do that?
A
A
A
A
Here’s a clear bullet-point gist of the algorithm in your image for diagnosing asthma in children (age 5–16) based on BTS, NICE, and SIGN guidelines:
Step 1: Initial Objective Tests
FeNO (fractional exhaled nitric oxide) – if available.
Bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) with spirometry – check for ≥12% increase in FEV₁.
Peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability – assess variability over time.
Blood or skin allergy tests – total IgE, specific IgE, blood eosinophils.
Step 2: Interpretation of Test Results
FeNO ≥35 ppb (or ≥20 ppb for younger children) → Suggests eosinophilic airway inflammation → supports asthma diagnosis.
Bronchodilator reversibility:
≥12% FEV₁ improvement (or ≥10% predicted) → supports asthma diagnosis.
PEF variability:
≥20% amplitude → supports asthma diagnosis.
Evidence of atopy (allergy tests):
Positive skin prick test or elevated specific IgE or total IgE/eosinophils → supports asthma diagnosis.
Step 3: Special Considerations
Negative or borderline tests:
Consider alternative diagnoses (e.g., cough, vocal cord dysfunction, recurrent infections).
If tests are equivocal:
Consider repeat testing or further specialist evaluation.
Confirming asthma:
If history is suggestive and one or more objective tests are positive, asthma diagnosis can be confirmed.
Key Takeaway
The algorithm uses a stepwise, objective approach, combining FeNO, spirometry, PEF variability, and allergy testing.
Diagnosis relies on history + at least one supportive objective test.
Negative or ambiguous results prompt alternative diagnoses or repeat evaluation.
If you want, I can also draw a simplified flowchart version of this algorithm that’s easier to memorize visually. It would condense it into a one-glance guide. Do you want me to do that?
A
a
A
A
No comments:
Post a Comment