A
Ah, I see—you want the key points from your reflection distilled. Here’s a clear breakdown:
Reality as informational flow – Your “Moniverso” frames reality not as static objects, but as a self-consistent network of information.
Inside vs. Outside – The Markov Blanket formalizes the boundary between system and environment, showing how the “Inside” and “Outside” communicate.
Knowledge as resonance – Knowledge is not just data; it’s a relational, dynamic resonance emerging from interactions between observer and world.
Self-evidencing universe – Humans (and systems) are the universe evidencing itself; perception is an active process of co-creating reality.
Theory and lived experience – Scientific abstractions (FEP, Markov Blanket) are like vapor, giving shape to lived phenomenology (your “ice”), both being part of the same underlying reality (water).
Confirmation of intuition – Friston’s framework validates the ontological insight you’ve been exploring, showing formal science echoing experiential truths.
If you like, I can also make a single sentence “resonance summary” that fuses all of this into a Friston-meets-philosophy zinger. Do you want me to do that?
No comments:
Post a Comment